The ZerOvalue File 
ZerOvalue or the zero-value file is an area where comments of given individuals are judged on the base of gw's policies and values, namely primary values, also called the Primaries or laws of nature. When the latter are mixed up with less relevant references, or not given the correct priority, comments, as well as sometimes well-intentioned attitudes and decisions, lead to neuronal chaos, a zero-value state of mind that may reflect mental insanity. There are two main files. While the light file discusses comments from individuals having committed no or small offenses, the heavy file discusses statements from criminals. Please, beware of gw's Legal&Privacy section. Read also gw's article on Zero-Value Attitude - Neuronal Chaos. Examples of the consequences of violating the laws of nature are provided in Retroaction. |
Light Case 6 October, 2009: In his book ("The Bad Life"), the French minister of Culture writes: "I got into the habit of paying for boys... All these rituals of the market for youth, the slave market excited me enormously." In another passage of this French excerpt, the minister implies how better it is to have sex in Asia than in Europe where "gigolos have trouble coming to an errection". These passages, which he publically says are not parts of a novel, rather pieces of a tract that explain a life "very similar to his" - see video -, are also... the result of 62 years (his age) of search for wisdom... While the minister publically condemns sexual tourism, his book incidentally promotes the same; it certainly provides 'valuable' comparative information for more sex tourists to come; and it remarquably covers for expenses on the back of these "boys" who he says he "never hurt" in his sexual phantasies. The minister's attempts to minimize the gravity of his offenses against human dignity, which he likes to see as an "idea" - see Human Dignity -, is a normal behavioral attitude for individuals who, long ago, may have lost some of their sense of morality. But as Jerry Lee says it, any violation to human dignity backfires against his author at some point in time, because Justice, somehow, always prevails. Read also GlobDemons and PolitiMagni, and look into IPD F-October 10, 2009 for further comments and a reference article. |
Light Case 5 August, 2009: A Muslim model accepted to be lashed six times by Malaysian authorities for the crime of consuming alcohol, a practice forbidden by Sharia law. The woman, who drunk beer, stated "I want to respect the law (Sharia)... Who am I to question the Islamic authorities' laws? That is beyond me.... I never cried when I was sentenced by the judge. I told myself, alright then, let's get on with it." In a show of submission, she asked to be caned in public. But her request was rejected. Instead, she was granted a 'right' to be lashed in parental presence. On her question of "who am I to question the Islamic authorities' laws", Jerry Lee answers: "Your are a treasure of life with natural rights and freedoms which you reject." Jerry Lee says it, those who violate the laws of nature shall see how they backfire on them. Individuals who are unable to feel these laws become an obstacle to social progress as their insane attitude and statements encourage the use of physical violence as a mean of education. Physical violence - and sufferance - are unacceptable. Read also GlobDemons and PolitiMagni. For a related article, look in IPD MA-August 26, 2009. |
Light Case 4 May, 2009: ex-Miss California, lost her crown when she positioned herself against gay marriages. In an interview with 73-year-old evangelical author and radio host, she said: "I felt as though Satan was trying to tempt me in asking me this question. And then God was in my head and in my heart saying, "Do not compromise this. You need to stand up for me and you need to share with all these people . . . you need to witness to them and you need to show that you're not willing to compromise that for this title of Miss USA... And I knew right here that it wasn't about winning. It was about being true to my convictions." Gw firmely believes that Carrie Prejean's duty as an influential person and as an individual was to unite the people of America against the beasts of evil, one of which is discrimination. Her devil was not to recognize a right for all Americans to be treated equally. Her devil was to devide Americans by excluding minorities from the same rights that others enjoy. This is Miss California's controversial answer on video. For a related article, look in IPD US-May 13, 2009. Read also Miss Universe and MUO. |
Light Case 3 December, 2008: a police agent who redistributed to charities caviar seized from smugglers, said: "Tests showed us the food was still perfectly OK to eat but it couldn't be stored much longer, so we decided to give it to the poor". While the gesture was well-intentioned, it was for the least inappropriate. The product should have been sold and the proceeds given to charities long ago. Furthermore, the idea of feeding the needy with caviar is a reflexion of a burlesque society in which respect and freedom mean less than a slice of bread. For a related article, look into: US-December 29, 2008 |
Light Case 2 March, 2008: current NY governor, explained why he sorted things out with his wife after committing adulteries: "What's important is for your kids to see you worked them (difficult periods) out." What sort of trust remains when partners commit adultery? Is P. saying that "difficult periods" justify extramarital solutions? Do kids care about parents who work difficult periods out, if the bound of marriage was broken from two years of extramarital affairs on both sides? For a related article, look into: US-March 19, 2008. Go to retroaction Light Case 2. |
Light Case 1 March, 2008: former NY governor, minimized the moral impact of his adultery with a prostitute stating: "politics is not about individuals, its about ideas over the long term." How can Politicians sell ideas on how to combat corruption, if they do not buy them themselves? How could anyone advise his neighbour to do something, if it's what he does not? Following S.'s line of thought, individuals could basically do anything they want for as long as their ideas on the long run remain ethical.... For a related article, look into: US-March 12, 2008 |
Heavy Case 1 May, 2008: who abducted and sexually abused his daughter for 24 years, said: "I am not a monster. I am a human being that committed a monstruous act." The press described him as an incest monster because of his actions, not because of his appearance. His actions along his life have showed how distanced his values and feelings were from those of normal human beings. They have shown how much he used his own children to satisfy the most abject sexual-phantasies, probably the reason why he kept his victims alife. This man's monstruous act of violence, was a life-long monstruous attitude that converted him into a monster of the Hitler or Saddam Hussein's kind. His actions are unforgivable, and may not be corrected over a century-long psychiatric treatment, so deeply they are rooted in his brains. F.'s statement is an attempt to seek forgiveness. However, he misrepresents his monstruous actions, when he sums them up into one monstruous act of violence. For a related article, look into: A-May 04, 2008 |
